What does Muschamp’s decision mean?
November 18th, 2008
The news that Texas DC Will Muschamp has agreed to hang around Austin as the head coach-in-waiting raises some interesting theories about Clemson’s coaching search.
Muschamp was believed to be a prime, if not a leading, candidate to replace Tommy Bowden.
First off, schools don’t just go throwing $900,000 offers to coordinators without a substantive explanation for doing so. Especially a coordinator who had been at Texas for only one year.
Clemson is not known to have interviewed Muschamp, but certainly if there was strong interest there, it would have been relayed through Muschamp’s agent, Jimmy Sexton. (And don’t get too caught up in whether someone has “formally” interviewed – more often than not, coaches are hired at this level without such interviews).
Not only does this make you wonder how strong an interest Clemson AD Terry Don Phillips might have expressed – it brings into question how much interest Texas perceived/was told Clemson had.
Could Texas officials justify throwing that kind of dough to a coordinator if they were in fact really only bidding against themselves?
Yes, the Longhorns could probably afford it regardless. But there must be more to it. Perhaps they must really feel, contrary to their stated belief, that 57-year-old Mack Brown is going to hang it up sooner rather than later.
Because for one, Muschamp isn’t going to wait five-plus years to be a head coach at that salary, especially when he could be making $1.5 million-plus somewhere else. And from Texas’ standpoint, you really get no assurance Muschamp is going to stay until Brown retires, so the major goal of this investment is just trying to hang onto Muschamp as long as you want him by throwing lots of cash and a snazzy title in his direction.
Note that last December, when West Virginia reportedly came calling to FSU offensive coordinator Jimbo Fisher, Sexton brokered a similarly lucrative coach-in-waiting deal for Fisher.
Did Sexton play Clemson in this deal, or did Texas really have to make a counter move? We might never know.
Here’s where conspiracy theorists can jump “all-in,” to steal a Dabo Swinney term:
Sexton, who is coming awfully close to violating the government’s anti-monopoly regulations, also represents Auburn’s Tommy Tuberville.
Muschamp had also been rumored to possibly succeed Tuberville if Tuberville is bought out of his contract soon.
Sexton obviously has his finger on that pulse, too. So, as conniving as all these backdoor politics go, it makes me wonder whether the Muschamp situation is tied into what is about to transpire at Auburn.
Did Muschamp agree to stay at Texas knowing Tuberville might last another year? Or might he have suckered Texas into a deal with insider knowledge that Clemson has greater interest in Tuberville if and when he might become available?
As for the latter — I highly, highly doubt it.
“Throw in the boat, and I’ll call my real estate agent right now.”
Muschamp cut his teeth as a DC under Tuberville before leaving last offseason, and I don’t have a firm answer on whether he left on the best of terms with either the Auburn coach or its administration. So who’s to say if Muschamp would consider Auburn in the first place.
Of course, the simple solution could be right under our noses.
It could be the cause of Muschamp’s decision or the effect … but all this could emphasize what was thought from the very beginning.
This job remains Swinney’s to lose.
Phillips has not hid his admiration for Swinney’s style, and everything Swinney has done has done in four weeks as the interim appointment has reinforced Phillips’ belief that Swinney “gets it.”
If Clemson wins the final two games, Phillips might find it difficult to not pull the trigger on a guy he feels is a coach-in-waiting.